Heads or tails? Tiger vets told to get to the bottom of it but don't make it snappy

By Bridie Smith, Science Editor
Updated February 28 2017 - 11:13am, first published January 11 2017 - 2:54pm
Melbourne Zoo's female tiger Binjai on the operating table after having her teeth checked and an anal gland removed.  Photo: Joe Armao
Melbourne Zoo's female tiger Binjai on the operating table after having her teeth checked and an anal gland removed. Photo: Joe Armao
Sumatran tiger Binjai during her operation at Melbourne Zoo. Photo: Joe Armao
Sumatran tiger Binjai during her operation at Melbourne Zoo. Photo: Joe Armao
Sandbags hold Melbourne Zoo's female tiger Binjai in place as vet staff prepare to ultrasound her bladder. Photo: Joe Armao
Sandbags hold Melbourne Zoo's female tiger Binjai in place as vet staff prepare to ultrasound her bladder. Photo: Joe Armao
14-year-old Sumatran tiger Binjai positioned on the X-ray table at Melbourne Zoo. Photo: Joe Armao
14-year-old Sumatran tiger Binjai positioned on the X-ray table at Melbourne Zoo. Photo: Joe Armao

It was a tough call as to who had the more unenviable job. The answer depended which end of a large and potentially dangerous predator you would rather be working on: the head (read canine teeth) or the tail (read anal gland).

Get the latest Bunbury news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.